asx stock market discussion forum

Member of the Month
1. bladerunner : 61.7 points
2. goldensnapper : 59.6 points
3. salvation : 58.1 points


       Fundamental Data

Data as of: 2016-02-08
Volume: 25,283,781
Close: $0.083
Open: $0.088
Low: $0.079
High: $0.089
Shares Issued: 3,488,438,369
Dividend Yield: 0.00%
Market Cap: $289,540,385
Price Book Value: 0.00
PER: -2.17



Lynas Corporation Limited is an Australia-based company. The Company is engaged in planning, design and construction of a concentration plant in Western Australia, and a materials processing plant in Malaysia. The Company is also engaged in the exploration and development of rare earths deposits and exploration for other mineral resources. The Company has a operations in Australia and Asia. The Company’s subsidiaries include Mt Weld Rare Earths Pty Ltd, Mt Weld Holdings Pty Ltd, Mt Weld Mining Pty Ltd, Mt Weld Niobium Pty Ltd, Lynas Chemet Australia Pty Ltd and Lynas Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

ASX:LYC Technicals
Stock Chart for ASX:LYC

ASX LYC stock discussion asx share trading advice LYC learning to trade stocks ASX LYC stock discussion

Is LYC a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Get your FREE analysis of LYNAS CORPORATION

asx LYC sharemarket discussion
1 Grade(s)
maxe  The Facts
2012-03-02 14:16:32     Forum: LYC     Post #746259    Read: 201 times   Position: Unknown    IP Address
LYC 20 Min Delayed Price LYC Market Depth (Live Price) LYC News LYC Financials LYC Latest Trades LYC Historical Data LYC Detailed Charts

Stop Lynas, save Malaysia but from what?

March 02, 2012

MARCH 2 Quick, name me another politician who is as passionate in opposing Lynas as Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh.

How about this instead: name me a politician who dared to break ranks on this Lynas issue. Besides that nuclear scientist guy. (His name is Che Rosli Che Mat by the way, and he taught nuclear science in UKM.)

If you are like the general public, you might have trouble naming names. Hence, the moment Tan Keng Liang of Gerakan demanded that Pakatan Rakyat politicians just shut up and agree with Che Roslis opinion unless they possess scientific arguments, he created an impasse that drew silence from most of his detractors.

Our elected representatives poor grasp on science (in this case, some basic nuclear physics) proved to be their undoing. As a result, both sides decided to either opt out or just toe their respective parties lines. A crucial environmental issue had effectively transformed into a political row with the government on Lynas side and opposition on the other.

To put things into perspective, let us recap what rare earths are, and what they are not. Rare earths by themselves are not radioactive. The by-product from their extraction, however, can contain thorium, and is radioactive. Thorium emits alpha-particles, instead of beta-particles used usually for cancer treatments or gamma-particles the most dangerous of all, or in fiction, turns one into a green angry giant.

Alpha-particles cannot even go through human skin, but materials emitting it are harmful once eaten or breathed in. So, when people talk about the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) being radioactive, they should actually mean its waste is radioactive, not rare earths or the plant itself.

Che Rosli had a point when he accused his colleague of being unscientific. The same accusations can be directed towards a segment of public with anti-Lynas sentiments too, who are prone to exaggerations and scare-mongering with their appeals to emotions. It is understandable though that they would go to such lengths. After all, the consequences might be too big to bear. But are such tactics justified?

After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, the industry has struggled to regain its credibility. Nothing illustrates this difficulty more than some anti-Lynas activists who discredit themselves by bringing this topic up. Comparing rare earth plants to nuclear power plants reeks of desperation, and is just downright sinister. No radioactive fuel is used, nor will meltdown happen, in a rare earth plant.

Closer to home, anti-Lynas activists point to the abandoned Asian Rare Earth (ARE) plant by Mitsubishi Chemicals in Bukit Merah. This comparison is unfair, for two major reasons. First, ARE was built more than 25 years ago, which in technological terms, is ancient. Second, ARE was built to extract the rare earth yttrium from mining leftover monazite, which can contain eight to 10 per cent thorium. In comparison. Lynas claims that LAMP will not be processing monazite, but mineral from the Mount Weld mine which is prized for having very low radiation, containing 0.17 per cent thorium.

The bulk of this fear can be attributed to the level of distrust against our ruling government and local authorities. A number of Malaysians just do not trust ourselves to run something that involves nuclear science. Youd have to wonder what these people have to say about our nuclear agency which has been running a nuclear reactor in Bangi since 1982.

As noted by my fellow columnist Hafiz Noor Shams, the government has been guilty of exaggerating the economic benefit of LAMP. A 12-year tax holiday, accepting collateral money from Lynas and keeping the public in the dark until New York Times broke the story these are easy ammunition for anyone to shoot down a government that is increasingly being distrusted by the public.

Lynas, too, is no less shady. Their rush to complete the plant in more cost-effective Malaysia instead of Australia is tainted with suspicions of cost-cutting from two of their contractors. UGL Ltd and AkzoNobel have pointed out major flaws within the concrete containment area, which Lynas promised would spare local soil and groundwater from toxic contamination.

Considering that rare earth is now indispensable in our lives we need to get them from somewhere, somehow what we are left with now is a case of not in my backyard. Until LAMP starts operating and Molycorp restarts its California site, China holds the world ransom by controlling 97 per cent of the worlds supply. Complete disregard for environmental and legal concerns means an even worse fate for the Chinese.

Like many other Malaysians, I do wish for a cleaner and greener Malaysia, but it should go beyond a partisan affair. Che Rosli might only be a nuclear scientist (the Lynas effect is a more multi-faceted issue) but at least he had the conviction to go against party line and bring forth his own arguments.

Why arent there more BN politicians questioning the environmental impact of LAMP? Shouldnt the PR politicians go beyond if we are the federal government, well shut Lynas down? Will anyone take Tan Keng Liangs challenge and come up with a factual retort instead of shouting RADIOACTIVE! over and over again?

Stopping Lynas and saving Malaysia they dont always need to be the same thing.

* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

Discuss LYC top ASX stocks


TopStocks Disclaimer
(i) does not endorse or vouch for the accuracy or authenticity of postings or any information made available on this Website either by members to this Website, or by the systems used in maintaining the Website such as scripting, databases and email communication.

(ii) You confirm that You are NOT a licensed investment adviser nor do You represent a licensed adviser. Under no circumstances are You to use this Website if You are either a licensed investment advisor or represent a licensed investment adviser. If believes in fact You are an investment adviser or representing such, Your account will be terminated immediately and other members will be notified on the general posting forum of Your account termination.

(iii) All information on the Website including Member Postings, Member Sentiments, Member Favourites, Member Grades, Member Ranking, Member Private Messages, Text or other media such as Images and any information where the thoughts of members are expressed (either singularly or in a condensed consensus manner) ("the Information") are AT BEST general information and is NOT professional investment advice.

(iv) We take no responsibility for the accuracy and authenticity of the Information presented in any form on the Website. Members on the Website are individually responsible for the accuracy and authenticity of their postings.

(v) All data and charts provided that are shown on pages starting with the domain name are provided by ADVFN under license as issued by the ASX.

Before using this website, you must agree to the TopStocks Terms Of Use.

stock discussion forum

TopStocks Enterprises Pty. Ltd.
Australia's Premier Stock Discussion Community.
ACN : 115 ..513 ..927

Data provided on pages is provided by Paritech
Data provided on pages is provided by ADVFN

TopStocks Site Map